The Impact of Digital Economy Development on Chinese Firms Performance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63671/ijeir.v2i2.103Keywords:
Digital economy, Firm performance, ARDL, NARDL, Internet penetration, ChinaAbstract
This study examines the dynamic and asymmetric effects of digital economy development on firm performance in China using annual time-series data spanning 2002 to 2024. Internet penetration rate is adopted as the primary proxy for digital economy development, while the aggregate Return on Assets (ROA) of Chinese A-share listed companies serves as the measure of firm performance. Employing the Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) and Nonlinear Autoregressive Distributed Lag (NARDL) frameworks, this study investigates both the long-run equilibrium relationship and short-run dynamic adjustment between these variables. The ARDL bounds test confirms the existence of a stable cointegrating relationship at the 1% significance level. The estimated long-run coefficient of digital economy development is 1.821, indicating that a 1% increase in internet penetration rate is associated with an approximate 0.018 percentage-point increase in aggregate firm ROA. The short-run coefficient (8.232) substantially exceeds the long-run estimate, demonstrating that the immediate impact of digital economy shocks is considerably more pronounced than the equilibrium effect. The error correction term coefficient (−0.800) is statistically significant, implying that approximately 80% of any short-run deviation is corrected within one year. The NARDL exploratory analysis does not confirm statistically significant asymmetric effects, reflecting the trajectory of uninterrupted digital expansion in China during the sample period. Robustness checks using an alternative proxy confirm the stability of the core findings. These results offer both theoretical insights and practical implications for digital infrastructure policy and corporate digital transformation strategies in emerging economies.
References
Barefoot, K., Curtis, D., Jolliff, W., Nicholson, J. R., & Omohundro, R. (2018). Defining and measuring the digital economy. US Department of Commerce Bureau of Economic Analysis, 15(2).
Brynjolfsson, E., & Hitt, L. M. (2000). Beyond computation: Information technology, organizational transformation and business performance. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(4), 23–48.
Chen, X., Zhang, X. E., Cai, Z., & Chen, J. (2024). The non-linear impact of digitalization on the performance of SMEs. Systems, 12(4), 139.
China Academy of Information and Communications Technology. (2023). Report on China's Digital Economy Development. CAICT.
Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, 4(16), 386–405.
Dickey, D. A., & Fuller, W. A. (1981). Likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Econometrica, 49(4), 1057–1072.
Hess, T. (2019). Digitale Transformation strategisch steuern. Springer-Verlag.
Liu, H., & Li, S. (2023). The impact of urban digital economy development on manufacturing innovation efficiency. International Journal of Empirical Economics, 2(02), 2350004.
Ma, L. F., Thanaphon, R., & Gumpora, S. (2024). Research on the impact of digital transformation on the performance of manufacturing enterprises. Proceedings of Business and Economic Studies, 7(4), 16–22.
Mouna, B., & Yassine, M. (2024). Business leadership in e-commerce in the USA: The impact of blockchain technology. Business Ethics and Leadership, 8(1), 116–128.
Pan, W., Xie, T., Wang, Z., & Ma, L. (2022). Digital economy: An innovation driver for total factor productivity. Journal of Business Research, 139, 303–311.
Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. J. (2001). Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16(3), 289–326.
Phillips, P. C., & Perron, P. (1988). Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika, 75(2), 335–346.
Richard, P. J., Devinney, T. M., Yip, G. S., & Johnson, G. (2009). Measuring organizational performance: Towards methodological best practice. Journal of Management, 35(3), 718–804.
Shin, Y., Yu, B., & Greenwood-Nimmo, M. (2014). Modelling asymmetric cointegration and dynamic multipliers in a nonlinear ARDL framework. In Festschrift in Honor of Peter Schmidt (pp. 281–314). Springer.
Syverson, C. (2011). What determines productivity? Journal of Economic Literature, 49(2), 326–365.
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533.
Wan, M. (2025). Organizational inertia and digital transformation outcomes: Evidence from Chinese enterprises.
Warner, K. S., & Wäger, M. (2019). Building dynamic capabilities for digital transformation. Long Range Planning, 52(3), 326–349.
Williamson, O. E. (2010). Transaction cost economics: The natural progression. American Economic Review, 100(3), 673–690.
Wu, F., Hu, H., Lin, H., & Ren, X. (2021). Enterprise digital transformation and capital market performance. Management World, 37(7), 130–144.
Zhang, T., Shi, Z. Z., Shi, Y. R., & Chen, N. J. (2022). Enterprise digital transformation and production efficiency. Economic Research–Ekonomska istraživanja, 35(1), 2781–2792.
Zhou, Z., Liu, W., Cheng, P., & Li, Z. (2022). The impact of the digital economy on enterprise sustainable development. Sustainability, 14(19), 11948.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Educational Innovations and Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Similar Articles
- Frank IBIKUNLE, Trends in Cybersecurity with Unethical Hacking , International Journal of Educational Innovations and Research: Vol. 1 No. 4: October-December 2025
- Albert Julian D. Arciaga, Emie A. Genton, PhD, The Effect of Performance-Based Incentives on School Performance and Job Satisfaction of Public-School Teachers , International Journal of Educational Innovations and Research: Vol. 2 No. 3: July-September 2026
- Saltiel Khololo Collen Mataboge, Revolutionizing Teaching Quality through Digital Pedagogies: A Catalytic Lens on Distance and Open e-Learning Institution , International Journal of Educational Innovations and Research: Vol. 1 No. 4: October-December 2025
- Richard S. Talaid, Leading Schools in A Digital Era: Appreciating the Success Stories of Adaptive School Heads , International Journal of Educational Innovations and Research: Vol. 2 No. 2: April-June 2026
- Godwyn Juferd Castillo, Shane Lanuza, Kaye Muffet, Joyce Marie Panuncialman, Rowena Ofima, Marlie Jane Sarno, The Use of Digital Storytelling to Improve Students’ Speaking Abilities , International Journal of Educational Innovations and Research: Vol. 2 No. 3: July-September 2026
- Prof. (Dr.) Amarjeet, Sports Nutrition: Enhancing Performance and Supporting Recovery , International Journal of Educational Innovations and Research: Vol. 2 No. 3: July-September 2026
- Dr. Richard Berimah Twum, Choosing the Right Predictive Lens: Evidence-Based Guidelines for Forecasting Employee Performance in Knowledge-Intensive Banking Environments , International Journal of Educational Innovations and Research: Vol. 2 No. 1: January-March 2026
- Philan D. Labrada, Instructional Supervision and Performance Appraisal of School Heads in Relation to Teachers' Professional Growth , International Journal of Educational Innovations and Research: Vol. 2 No. 2: April-June 2026
- Dr. Richard Berimah Twum, Prof Abdul Aziz Ibn Musah, Dr. Ernestina Hope Turkson, Bridging the Validity Gap: Mitigating Strategic Overfitting in Management Analytics through Advanced Predictive Metrics , International Journal of Educational Innovations and Research: Vol. 2 No. 1: January-March 2026
- Daniel Fuachie, Edward Abasimi, Mathematics anxiety and academic achievement among Junior High School students in the Sagnarigu Municipality , International Journal of Educational Innovations and Research: Vol. 2 No. 3: July-September 2026
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
