From Programming to Action: Educational Robotics for the Development of Computational Thinking and Transversal Skills in Elementary School in Italy

Authors

  • Gabriele Letizia Teacher and Electronic Engineer Primo Istituto Comprensivo A. Moro – P. Virgilio Marone, Italy

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63671/ijeir.v2i3.152

Keywords:

educational robotics, elementary school, computational thinking, block-based programming, MicroBit, problem solving, cooperative learning, scaffolding

Abstract

Educational robotics provides a particularly meaningful learning environment for introducing elementary school students to the principles of programming and computational thinking through concrete, collaborative, and problem-solving-oriented experiences. This paper describes a teaching experience carried out with a fourth-grade elementary school class as part of a workshop program aimed at developing skills in programming, robotics, and problem solving at Primo Istituto Comprensivo “A. Moro – P. Virgilio Marone” in Italy.

The program progressively guided the students from learning about the MicroBit board and visual block-based programming to using sensors, motors, and actuators, and finally to designing algorithms for line following and obstacle detection. The activities took place in the computer lab, alternating between individual work and small-group activities.

The methodological framework integrated active and experiential learning, a constructivist approach, problem solving, cooperative learning, the inductive method, and progressive scaffolding. The program was designed with a progression of increasing difficulty, in which each activity served as a prerequisite for the next. The observed results highlight a solid acquisition of the intended technical skills, a significant development in problem-decomposition and analysis abilities, and increasing autonomy during the debugging phase. Positive results also emerged in collaborative skills, peer communication, and error management. The experience confirms the potential of educational robotics as a teaching tool capable of making abstract concepts concrete and integrating digital, cognitive, and social-relational skills.

References

Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x

Bers, M. U., Flannery, L., Kazakoff, E. R., & Sullivan, A. (2014). Computational thinking and tinkering: Exploration of an early childhood robotics curriculum. Computers & Education, 72, 145–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.10.020

Ching, Y.-H., & Hsu, Y.-C. (2023). Educational robotics for developing computational thinking in young learners: A systematic review. TechTrends. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-023-00841-1

Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and Education. Macmillan.

Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Holubec, E. J. (1998). Cooperation in the Classroom (7th ed.). Interaction Book Company.

Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas. Basic Books.

Pólya, G. (1945). How to Solve It: A New Aspect of Mathematical Method. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvc773pk JJSTOR

Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223–231. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x

Prince, M. J., & Felder, R. M. (2006). Inductive teaching and learning methods: Definitions, comparisons, and research bases. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(2), 123–138. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.21689830.2006.tb00884.x

Tselegkaridis, S., & Sapounidis, T. (2022). Exploring the features of educational robotics and STEM research in primary education: A systematic literature review. Education Sciences, 12(5), 305. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12050305

Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33–35. https://doi.org/10.1145/1118178.1118215

Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x

Downloads

Published

2026-09-15