Exploring the Integration of Artificial Intelligence in Special Education: A Case Study of Teachers’ Experiences in Pagadian City
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63671/ijeir.v2i2.99Keywords:
artificial intelligence, special education, SPED teachers, technology integration, PhilippinesAbstract
Special education (SPED) classrooms in developing countries face a critical gap between national digital transformation policies and ground-level implementation realities. This study investigated how SPED teachers at Tomas Sagun Integrated School in Pagadian City, Philippines, incorporate Artificial Intelligence (AI) into instruction for students with special needs. Using a qualitative case study design, semi-structured interviews were conducted with eight purposively selected SPED teachers, analyzed thematically through the TPACK Framework, Vygotsky’s Sociocultural Theory, the Technology Acceptance Model, and the Philippine Professional Standards for Teachers. Four key themes emerged: AI use remains minimal but gradually emerging; AI is employed mainly for administrative tasks and lesson preparation rather than direct classroom instruction; persistent barriers include poor infrastructure, absence of formal AI training, lack of institutional policy, and disability-specific constraints; and teachers firmly believe that compassionate, relationship-driven pedagogy cannot be replaced by AI. The study concludes that limited AI adoption is driven primarily by structural and systemic challenges rather than teacher resistance, and offers evidence-based recommendations for policy, professional development, and classroom practice in AI-supported special education.
References
Alam, M. M. (2026). Artificial intelligence and education for children with special needs. International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews, 13(1), 606–613.
Al-Hendawi, M., & H. E. (2025). Investigation into the applications of artificial intelligence (AI) in special education: A literature review. Social Sciences, 14(288). https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci14050288
Almarzouq, N. S., Almedlij, M. A., & Alshahrani, H. (2025). Special education teachers’ perspectives on the use of artificial intelligence applications in teaching students with disabilities. Educational Process: International Journal, 17, e2025407. https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2025.17.407
Alsudairy, N. A., & Eltantawy, M. M. (2024). Special education teachers’ perceptions of using artificial intelligence in educating students with disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability—Diagnosis and Treatment, 12, 92–102. https://doi.org/10.6000/2292-2598.2024.12.02.5
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Cabanes, A. A., & Galigao, R. P. (2025). Evaluating AI-powered assistive technologies in inclusive education: A systematic review of literature on efficacy and accessibility. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 9(3IS), 5568–5577. https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.903SEDU0405
Chanthiran, M., Mariappan, P., Govinndasamy, P., & Kanawazi, K. (2025). Interpreting the role of artificial intelligence (AI) tools and assistive technologies in enhancing accessibility in primary school special education. MJSSH Online: Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 9(4), 53–64. https://doi.org/10.33306/mjssh/365
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Department of Education. (2017). Philippine Professional Standards for Teachers (DepEd Order No. 42, s. 2017). Department of Education.
Department of Education. (2026, January 9). Future-ready educAItion: PBBM, Angara naglunsad ng AI Program para suportahan ang mga guro at mag-aaral.
Fitas, R. (2025). Inclusive education with AI: Supporting special needs and tackling language barriers. AI and Ethics, 5(2), 5729–5757. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-025-00824-3
Fteiha, M., Al-Rashaida, M., & Ghazal, M. (2025). General and special education teachers’ readiness for artificial intelligence in classrooms: A structural equation modeling study. PLoS One, 20(9), e0331941. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0331941
Goldman, S. R., Smith, S. J., & Carreon, A. (2025). Special education teachers’ use of AI to support students with disabilities in writing. Frontiers in Education, 10, Article 1710974. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1710974
Gupta, M., & Kaul, S. (2024). AI in inclusive education: A systematic review of opportunities and challenges in the Indian context. MIER Journal of Educational Studies Trends & Practices, 14(2), 429–461. https://doi.org/10.52634/mier/2024/v14/i2/2702
Harkins-Brown, A. R., Carling, L. Z., & Peloff, D. C. (2025). Artificial intelligence in special education. Encyclopedia, 5(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia5010011
Kumari, R. K. (2025). Artificial intelligence in special education: Enhancing learning outcomes for students with disabilities (pp. 79–111). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-5538-1.ch003
Li, Z. (2025). Artificial intelligence enabling special education teacher development: Building support systems and practical paths. International Theory and Practice in Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(5), 92–105. http://doi.org/10.70693/itphss.v2i5.318
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications.
Manaig, K. A., Yazon, A. D., Buama, C. A. C., & Bonganciso, R. T. (2025). Teachers’ awareness in artificial intelligence and digital competence in the workplace. Advanced Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 26–43. https://doi.org/10.31098/ajosed.v3i1.3302
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
Mo, D., & Mo, B. (2024). A study of artificial intelligence-driven educational intervention strategies for students with special educational needs. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences, 9(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.2478/amns-2024-3059
Ozbilen, F. M., Gunay, G., Dilber, Y., & Esen, F. (2025). Evaluation of teachers’ views on the use of artificial intelligence in the education of students with special education needs. Kulonleges Banasmad Interdiszciplinaris folyoirat, 11(3), 115–128. https://doi.org/10.18458/KB.2025.3.115
Panjwani-Charania, S., & Zhai, X. (2024). AI for students with learning disabilities: A systematic review. In X. Zhai & J. Krajcik (Eds.), Uses of artificial intelligence in STEM education (pp. 469–496). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198882077.003.0021
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Republic Act No. 7277, Magna Carta for Disabled Persons (Phil. 1992). https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/1992/03/24/republic-act-no-7277/
Republic Act No. 11650, An Act Instituting a Policy of Inclusion and Services for Learners with Disabilities in Support of Inclusive Education, 118 Official Gazette No. 12, 2828 (Phil. 2022).
Shaheen, H. R. A., & Zanoon, N. I. M. (2025). The role of artificial intelligence applications for individuals with special needs: Perceptions of special education teachers in Amman city, Jordan. TPM, 32(4), 1673–1679. https://www.tpmap.org/
Song, Y., Sang, H., Chen, S., Chen, L., & Cai, J. (2025). Application and trends of artificial intelligence in special education: A case study of autistic children. Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 9(10), 23–30.
Sumer Dodur, H. M., & Kose, G. (2025). General special education pre-service teachers’ conscientiousness and their attitudes towards artificial intelligence: The mediating roles of AI literacy and AI anxiety. European Journal of Education, 4 (early view), 70276. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70276
Ulas, R., Adci, B., & Ilker, O. (2025). Artificial intelligence and innovative educational technologies in students with learning disabilities: A systematic review. Journal of Teacher Education and Lifelong Learning, 7(2), 248–262. https://doi.org/10.51535/tell.1725012
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Wabingga, R. J. S. (2025). SPED teachers: The stories of their struggles in the new normal education. Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 3(5), 337–345. https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2024.678
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Educational Innovations and Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Similar Articles
- Mike R. Canoy, April Dawn B. Ruales, Justriel G. Tutor, Jieza J. Villarino, Riza Mae P. Basa, Natty Lorraine P. Bayocot, Artificial Intelligence in Special Education: Assessing Teachers' Level of Use and Readiness at Tomas Sagun Integrated School, Pagadian City, Philippines , International Journal of Educational Innovations and Research: Vol. 2 No. 3: July-September 2026
- Njoku Ugochukwu Roland, Human Dignity in Thomas Auinas Epstemology and Artificial Intelligence , International Journal of Educational Innovations and Research: Vol. 1 No. 4: October-December 2025
- Guiaria A. Timbao, Francisco M. Espinosa, Colors of Inclusion: Exploring the Challenges of Teachers, Learners and Stakeholders on the Innovative Art Program , International Journal of Educational Innovations and Research: Vol. 2 No. 3: July-September 2026
- Amritpal Kaur, Spiritual Intelligence and Social Adjustment of Senior Secondary School Teachers: A Correlational Study , International Journal of Educational Innovations and Research: Vol. 2 No. 1: January-March 2026
- Priyanka Tripathi, Renu Yadav, Government vs. Private Teacher Education Institutions: A Comparative Study of Student Teachers’ Attitudes towards Teaching , International Journal of Educational Innovations and Research: Vol. 1 No. 3: July-September 2025
- Abdullah Mazharuddin Khaja, Michidmaa Arikhad, Hira Rafi, Artificial Intelligence in Neuro-Ophthalmic Healthcare: Bridging Eyesight and Brain Function , International Journal of Educational Innovations and Research: Vol. 1 No. 2: April-June 2025
- Rochelle G. Onrejas, Emie A. Genton, PhD, Unveiling the Journey of Indigenous People (IP) Learners from the Geographically Isolated and Disadvantaged Areas (GIDA) , International Journal of Educational Innovations and Research: Vol. 2 No. 3: July-September 2026
- Nisith Kumar Singh , A Study of Comparative Teacher-freezing of Higher Education Teachers working in Rural and Urban Areas , International Journal of Educational Innovations and Research: Vol. 1 No. 3: July-September 2025
- Harpreet Kaur, Impact of Emotional Intelligence and Job Satisfaction on Teaching Effectiveness of Secondary School Teachers , International Journal of Educational Innovations and Research: Vol. 1 No. 1: January-March 2025
- Dr. Thinawanga Portia Mavhandu, Dr. Ikekhwa Albert Ikhile , Professor Azwihangwisi Helen Mavhandu-Mudzusi , A Transformative Model for Strengthening Teachers' Roles in Fostering Literacy Practices in Under-Resourced Preschool Classrooms , International Journal of Educational Innovations and Research: Vol. 1 No. 2: April-June 2025
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Mike R. Canoy, April Dawn B. Ruales, Justriel G. Tutor, Jieza J. Villarino, Riza Mae P. Basa, Natty Lorraine P. Bayocot, Artificial Intelligence in Special Education: Assessing Teachers' Level of Use and Readiness at Tomas Sagun Integrated School, Pagadian City, Philippines , International Journal of Educational Innovations and Research: Vol. 2 No. 3: July-September 2026
