Spatial Assessment of Household Perceptions of Urban Infrastructure and Basic Municipal Services in Prayagraj City, India

Authors

  • Amit Kumar Tiwari Department of Geography , University of Allahabad image/svg+xml
  • Prof. A. R. Siddiqui Department of Geography , University of Allahabad image/svg+xml

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63671/ijsesr.v2i1.167

Keywords:

Urban transformation, Municipal services, Household perception, Urban infrastructure, Prayagraj, Spatial variation, Chi-square, Cramer’s V, Urban planning

Abstract

Rapid urban growth creates increasing demand for roads, drainage, sewerage, waste management, water supply, street lighting, parking, green spaces and other municipal services. Understanding how residents experience these services is important for inclusive urban planning. This study examines household perceptions of urban infrastructure and basic municipal services in Prayagraj City, Uttar Pradesh. Primary data were collected from 384 households between September 2024 and January 2025. The sample was distributed equally across eight municipal zones, with 48 households from each zone. Ten major municipal problems were examined: roads and maintenance, drainage, solid waste management, sewerage, street lighting, parking, parks and green spaces, encroachment, water supply and public toilets. Descriptive percentage analysis was combined with Pearson’s Chi-square test and Cramer’s V to examine whether reported municipal problems varied significantly across zones. Roads and maintenance were reported by 53.9 percent of households, in drainage (49.7 percent) and solid waste management (49.5 percent). Sewerage was reported by 44.0 percent, street lighting by 42.7 percent, parking by 41.1 percent, parks and green spaces by 40.1 percent, encroachment by 35.2 percent, water supply by 30.2 percent, and public toilets by 25.0 percent. However, the Chi-square analysis did not identify a statistically significant association between municipal zone and any of the ten reported problems at the 5 percent level. Cramer’s V values ranged from 0.101 to 0.174, indicating weak associations. The results suggest that municipal service concerns are broadly distributed across Prayagraj rather than being statistically concentrated in one particular zone.

References

Agresti, A. (2002). Categorical Data Analysis (2nd ed.). Wiley.

Akoglu, H. (2018). User's guide to correlation coefficients. Turkish Journal of Emergency Medicine, 18(3), 91–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjem.2018.08.001

Bharathi, N., Malghan, D., Mishra, S., & Rahman, A. (2022). Residential segregation and public services in urban India. Urban Studies.

Cramér, H. (1946). Mathematical Methods of Statistics. Princeton University Press.

Kim, H.-Y. (2017). Statistical notes for clinical researchers: Chi-squared test and Fisher's exact test. Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics, 42(2), 152–155. https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2017.42.2.152

Kumar, A. (2015). Indian urban households’ access to basic amenities: Deprivations, disparities and determinants. Margin: The Journal of Applied Economic Research, 9(3), 278–305.

Kundu, A., Rahaman, M., & Khan, K. (2024). Access of urban poor to basic services: Concerns of sustainability and equity. Social Change, 54(1), 7–35.

Prayagraj Municipal Corporation. (2026). Prayagraj Municipal Corporation: Civic infrastructure and public services.

Saroj, S. K., Goli, S., Rana, M. J., & Choudhary, B. K. (2020). Availability, accessibility, and inequalities of water, sanitation, and hygiene services in Indian metro cities. Sustainable Cities and Society, 54, 101878.

Sharholy, M., Ahmad, K., Mahmood, G., & Trivedi, R. C. (2008). Municipal solid waste management in Indian cities: A review. Waste Management, 28(2), 459–467.

Van Ryzin, G. G., Muzzio, D., Immerwahr, S., Gulick, L., & Martinez, E. (2004). Drivers and consequences of citizen satisfaction: An application of the American Customer Satisfaction Index model to New York City. Public Administration Review, 64(3), 331–341.

Van Ryzin, G. G., Immerwahr, S., & Altman, S. (2008). Measuring street cleanliness: A comparison of New York City’s scorecard and results from a citizen survey. Public Administration Review, 68(2), 295–303.

UN-Habitat. (2022). World Cities Report 2022: Envisaging the Future of Cities. United Nations Human Settlements Programme.

World Bank. (2018). Poverty and Shared Prosperity 2018: Piecing Together the Poverty Puzzle. World Bank.

Yadav, D., Mahato, S., Choudhary, A., Joshi, P. K., et al. (2024). Cultural heritage and urban morphology: Land use transformation in ‘Kumbh Mela’ of Prayagraj, India. Frontiers of Urban and Rural Planning, 2, 8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44243-024-00029-y.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-31

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Tiwari, A. K., & Siddiqui, A. R. (2026). Spatial Assessment of Household Perceptions of Urban Infrastructure and Basic Municipal Services in Prayagraj City, India. International Journal of Science and Engineering Science Research, 2(1), 111-122. https://doi.org/10.63671/ijsesr.v2i1.167

Similar Articles

1-10 of 22

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)