A Comprehensive Framework for the Fusion of Anatomical (CT, MRI) and Functional (PET, SPECT) Medical Images for Enhanced Diagnostic Precision

Authors

  • Prashant Srivastava School of Engineering and Technology (UIET) , Chhatrapati Shahu Ji Maharaj University image/svg+xml
  • Himanshu Shukla School of Engineering and Technology (UIET) , Chhatrapati Shahu Ji Maharaj University image/svg+xml
  • Ravi Kant Mishra School of Engineering and Technology (UIET) , Chhatrapati Shahu Ji Maharaj University image/svg+xml
  • Ritesh Agarwal School of Engineering and Technology (UIET) , Chhatrapati Shahu Ji Maharaj University image/svg+xml
  • Anand Kumar Mishra School of Engineering and Technology (UIET) , Chhatrapati Shahu Ji Maharaj University image/svg+xml
  • Shivneet Tripathi School of Engineering and Technology (UIET) , Chhatrapati Shahu Ji Maharaj University image/svg+xml

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63671/ijsesr.v2i4.172

Keywords:

Medical image fusion, CT, MRI, PET, SPECT, multimodal imaging, deep learning, wavelet transform, diagnostic imaging

Abstract

Medical image fusion aims to integrate complementary information from multimodal imaging techniques to provide a more comprehensive visualization for diagnosis and treatment planning. This study presents a novel framework for fusing anatomical images (CT and MRI) with functional images (PET and SPECT), addressing challenges related to resolution disparity, spatial misalignment, and modality-specific noise. The proposed method utilizes a hybrid approach combining deep learning-based registration, wavelet-based fusion, and contrast enhancement techniques. Evaluation on clinical datasets demonstrates improved anatomical-functional correspondence, enhanced tumor delineation, and superior performance on quantitative metrics such as mutual information (MI), structural similarity index (SSIM), and edge preservation index. The results support the clinical utility of fused images in oncology, neurology, and cardiology.

References

James, A. P., & Dasarathy, B. V. (2014). Medical image fusion: A survey of the state of the art. Information Fusion, 19, 4–19.

Liu, Y., Chen, X., Ward, R. K., & Wang, Z. J. (2017). Image fusion with convolutional neural networks: A review and an experimental comparison. Information Fusion, 42, 141–156.

Gao, Y., et al. (2019). Deep learning for image registration: A review. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 38(10), 2365–2379.

Zhang, Q., & Blum, R. S. (1999). A categorization of multiscale-decomposition-based image fusion schemes with a performance study for a digital camera application. Proceedings of the IEEE, 87(8), 1315–1326.

D. Rueckert, et al. (2006). "Nonrigid registration of medical images: a survey." Medical Image Analysis, 10(1), 1-20.

Moller, H. et al. (2018). "Functional Imaging in Neurosurgery: A Review of Current Practice." Neurosurgical Review, 41(2), 261-272.

Patel, H., et al. (2019). "Advances in Cardiac Imaging: The Role of Fusion Techniques." Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging, 12(2), e008656.

Schmidt, H., et al. (2017). "The role of PET/CT in the management of oncology patients." European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 44(4), 675 688.

T. T. K. A. A. L. (2021). "Real-time imaging and surgical navigation: Current perspectives." Journal of Surgical Research, 267, 62-69.

Zhang, Y., et al. (2019). "Feature-based medical image fusion: An overview." Journal of Biomedical Imaging, 2019, 1-15.

Zhang, Y., et al. (2020). "Decision-level fusion in medical imaging." IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 39(7), 2116-2130.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-06